The Watchman on the Wall

Category: medical experiment

  • The New Abnormal: The Rise of the Biomedical Security State

    The New Abnormal: The Rise of the Biomedical Security State

    From Dr Mercola, in the video , I interview Dr. Aaron Kheriaty, author of “The New Abnormal: The Rise of the Biomedical Security State.” Kheriaty is a medical doctor and psychiatrist and worked as a professor in the School of Medicine at the University of California Irvine for 15 years before getting fired for his objections to mandatory COVID shots.

    He also directs the Bioethics and American Democracy Program at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and is a senior scholar and fellow of the Brownstone Institute.

    “As ethics program director and ethics community chair, I was involved in basically all of the pandemic policy drafting, right up until the vaccine mandate,” Kheriaty says.

    “Our committee at the Office of the President had done the ventilator triage policy, the vaccine allocation policy. But when it came to the vaccine mandate, it came down from on high and there was no discussion debate. Our committee was not involved in drafting the policy.

    I was very concerned about the lack of open discussion and debate. Because of all the sensitive policies that we had developed during the pandemic, this one I thought was going to be the most ethically controversial, problematic and the most publicly fraught.

    So, I was puzzled by the fact that we didn’t really have a conversation about it. I published a piece in The Wall Street Journal last year, arguing that vaccine mandates are unethical based on the principle of informed consent, which I teach to all the medical students every year.

    This is the principle that an adult of sound mind has the right to decide: what medications or interventions to accept or decline, and they have the right to make this decision on behalf of their children who are not yet old enough to give consent.

    I was very concerned that vaccine mandates were just tossing this principle overboard under the guise of, ‘We’re in emergency and so the regular rules don’t apply.’ I think it’s precisely in wartime and crises that it’s all the more important to stand fast and hold onto our ethical principles, because those are the times where we’re most tempted to abandon them. And when you do that, you can often invite disaster.”

    Doctors Were Bullied Into Not Writing Medical Exemptions

    Despite a number of efforts, the university refused to engage in a debate, and instead put the mandatory COVID jab policy in place. As students started to be steamrolled, many reached out to him for help. They’d day things like, “I’m not a religious person, and so, in good conscience, I don’t want to submit a dishonest religious exemption, but I have other moral or ethical concerns about this vaccine.”

    Others were unable to get an appropriate medical exemption. The reason they couldn’t get one was because the California Medical Board sent a letter threatening to revoke the medical license of any physician who wrote “inappropriate exemptions.” They, of course, never defined what was appropriate or inappropriate, but it had the intended effect. Doctors were incredibly hesitant to write medical exemptions at all, for fear of the repercussions.

    “I remember one patient of mine, a young man who went to his rheumatologist and this doctor told him, ‘Given your autoimmune condition, given what I’ve seen of the vaccine data so far, I recommend that you don’t get the vaccine because I think you’re young and otherwise healthy. You’re not at high risk of COVID, but the vaccine could exacerbate your autoimmune condition.’

    The patient then turned to him and said, ‘OK, can you write me a medical exemption because there’s a mandate at my place of employment?’ The same doctor that just recommended against the vaccine said, ‘No, I’m sorry, I can’t do that because I might lose my medical license.’ So this was the, in my view, intolerable situation that we found ourselves in 2021.

    I just couldn’t imagine trying to teach the principle of informed consent, which I do in the second lecture, or talking with them about integrity and moral courage, standing up and doing the right thing even though you’re at the bottom of the hospital hierarchy as a medical student.

    I couldn’t imagine having those conversations if I had seen something being rolled out that I knew was wrong, that I knew was harming people. I could see my colleagues, nurses and other very good professionals in the hospital getting fired, having their jobs threatened by this [mandate]. If I hadn’t stood up and done something, I just don’t think I would have woken up with a clear conscience.”

    Kheriaty Fired After Legal Challenge

    Kheriaty ended up filing a lawsuit in federal court, challenging the vaccine mandate. He argued on behalf of people with natural immunity because, strategically, he thought that was an argument that stood on solid ground legally. The university responded by first placing him on investigatory leave, followed by unpaid suspension. Two months after the lawsuit was filed, they fired him. Kheriaty ended up opening a private practice, and so far has fared well.

    “I have been able to provide for my family and get, almost, back to the point where I was before in terms of earnings. But it’s much more hand to mouth now. I don’t know how things are going to look year to year. I’m not a salaried employee anymore, but I’ve been able to cobble together various sources of support, including the book I wrote …

    I’ve been able to replicate my clinical work. I’m able to see my patients in my private practice. I’m able to do my research, writing and speaking. The Ethics and Public Policy Center in D.C., the Brownstone Institute and the Zephyr Institute have offered me a bit of support to keep that work going.

    The one thing I haven’t really been able to replicate, at least not in the same way, is the teaching and supervision of medical students and residents, which I really enjoyed … That was hard to walk away from, but when I mention that, other people have told me, ‘Yes, but you’re teaching now, you’re just teaching on a different and maybe even on a bigger scale,’ because my case got quite a bit of attention.

    My social media profile expanded and I’ve been given lots of opportunities this year to speak on podcasts to larger audiences, to speak at conferences, and I’ve met some extraordinary people in the medical freedom movement. So I have new colleagues and new friends that are really remarkable and amazing people that I feel a strong connection and solidarity with, because we’re all trying to pull the cart in the same direction.

    We’re all concerned about what’s happened to science and medicine during the pandemic — or I should say what’s happened over the last several decades that really fully manifested during the pandemic.

    So, it’s been exciting to be a part of that, to be able to testify at the U.S. Senate, at the California Senate, to get involved in some other legal cases that have to do with physicians’ free speech rights and preserving the integrity of the doctor-patient relationship, so that outside governmental intrusions don’t undermine it.

    The work I’ve done this year has been really tremendously rewarding, and I’m grateful for that, so I have no regrets. And even without all those things, there’s nothing better than waking up with a clear conscience, knowing that I tried to do the right thing and that I didn’t compromise my convictions out of convenience.”

    Preserving the Freedom of Speech for Physicians

    One of the legal cases Kheriaty has gotten involved with is trying to block a new California law from taking effect. September 30, 2022, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed California Assembly Bill 2098, which was set to take effect January 1, 2023.

    AB 2098 prohibits doctors from providing COVID-19 treatment or advice to a patient when that treatment or advice includes false information, and/or contradicts “contemporary scientific consensus,” and/or is “contrary to the standard of care.”

    A doctor found to violate this law is guilty of “unprofessional conduct” and can face disciplinary action, including having his or her medical license revoked. As noted by Kheriaty:

    “This, to my mind, obviously undermines the core element that has to be the centerpiece of medicine, which the trust that the patient has in their physician …

    I don’t know of anyone who would want to ask their physician a question … and not have their physician give them an honest answer based on his or her actual medical judgment and reading of the scientific literature. A physician with a gag order is not a physician that you can trust.”

    So, together with four other California-based doctors — Tracy Hoeg, Ram Duriseti, Pete Mazolewski and Azadeh Khatibi — Kheriaty filed a lawsuit against Newsom and other officials, including the president and members of the Medical Board of California, to block this law.1

    “I think everyone wants their physician to be able to say what they think … and not just be reading from a script that the government gave them,” Kheriaty says.

    “So, this lawsuit challenges this unjust law in federal court, again on the basis of a constitutional claim that this, No. 1, infringes on the rights of free speech of the physician and, No. 2, is also a violation of the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Rights of Physicians …

    We have a constitutional right that’s been established by the court’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment to have laws that are sufficiently clear that a person can know whether or not they’re in violation of the law, so that you don’t have this looming thing in the background that you’re always wondering, ‘Am I OK or am I not OK?’ So, I’m cautiously optimistic that we will prevail in court.”

    Federal Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction

    Another lawsuit, filed by Children’s Health Defense (CHD), Dr. LeTrinh Hoang and Physicians for Informed Consent, is also seeking to get the law tossed out. December 7, 2022, attorneys for the CHD filed a motion for preliminary injunction while its legal challenge makes its way through the courts.2

    January 26, 2023, Senior U.S. District Judge William Shubb granted the CHD’s preliminary injunction.3,4 According to Shubb, the defendants had failed to provide evidence that “scientific consensus” has any “established technical meaning,” and that the law provides “no clarity” on the meaning of the word “misinformation.” As noted by Shubb:5

    “Who determines whether a consensus exists to begin with? If a consensus does exist, among whom must the consensus exist (for example practicing physicians, or professional organizations, or medical researchers, or public health officials, or perhaps a combination)?

    In which geographic area must the consensus exist (California, or the United States, or the world)? What level of agreement constitutes a consensus (perhaps a plurality, or a majority, or a supermajority)? How recently in time must the consensus have been established to be considered ‘contemporary’?

    And what source or sources should physicians consult to determine what the consensus is at any given time (perhaps peer-reviewed scientific articles, or clinical guidelines from professional organizations, or public health recommendations)?

    The statute provides no means of understanding to what ‘scientific consensus’ refers … Because the term ‘scientific consensus’ is so ill-defined, physician plaintiffs are unable to determine if their intended conduct contradicts the scientific consensus, and accordingly ‘what is prohibited by the law’ …

    Vague statutes are particularly objectionable when they ‘involve sensitive areas of First Amendment freedoms’ because ‘they operate to inhibit the exercise of those freedoms.’”

    As reported by the CHD:6

    “Judge Shubb’s ruling prevents enforcement of AB 2098 pending resolution of the lawsuit. According to lead counsel Rick Jaffe, ‘Judge Shubb looked at the law and correctly determined that the COVID misinformation was unconstitutionally vague, in large part because the plaintiffs in both cases showed there is no ‘current scientific consensus,’ given the fast-changing pace of the pandemic.’

    ‘The case will now proceed on two tracks,’ Jaffe said, adding: ‘The parties will continue to litigate the case before Judge Shubb and we will be filing a motion for summary judgment in the not-too-distant future.

    But because we won, and because a judge in the Central District of California denied a similar challenge to AB 2098, the attorney general will certainly appeal and argue that the central district judge was right. So, there is much more to come.’”

    Kheriaty Is Also Suing the White House

    Kheriaty is also a plaintiff in the Missouri v. Biden case, filed by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, in which they argue that the Biden administration is colluding with Big Tech to illegally censor Americans. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and Martin Kulldorff, Ph.D., — two authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, an early critique of lockdowns and school closures — have also joined the case.

    “There’s been a lot of attention in recent weeks on the Twitter files, where we’re looking under the hood at that social media company and seeing, for example, a relationship with the FBI, where the FBI is basically telling Twitter what to do and what to censor and which accounts to shut down,” Kheriaty says.

    “Arguably, the social media companies can do this as private entities … but inarguably, no one doubts that the federal government cannot censor Americans. That’s a clear free speech First Amendment violation. And the federal government cannot … pressure other entities into doing its bidding as a long arm of its censorship regime.

    We’re hoping, first of all, to uncover exactly what’s going on with this collusion, and the materials that we have so far in discovery in this case have clearly shown that not only is this happening, but it’s happening on a vaster scale than we suspected when we first filed the lawsuit. At least 17 different federal agencies have been involved in this censorship regime.

    So I think that case is going to receive increasing attention in the new year as it proceeds and as more and more information comes out from other investigative reporters on what’s been going on …”

    During his deposition for this case, Dr. Anthony Fauci, former director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, had what Kheriaty calls “wildly implausible memory lapses.” He said “I don’t know” 174 times. “If he were to be honest … he’s probably worried that it would implicate him in ways that are problematic,” Kheriaty says.

    Propaganda in the COVID Era

    I’ve previously interviewed psychologist Mattias Desmet about the role of mass formation in the government’s ability to infringe on our human rights and freedoms. Kheriaty agrees that the mass formation mechanism has been part of the problem, but it’s not the only one.

    “I don’t think mass formation is the only mechanism at work in terms of accounting for our COVID response. In addition to that theory, which I mentioned in my book, I take a look at the more deliberate employment and deployment of fear through propaganda.

    And, through other subtle and not so subtle mechanisms of coercion that were operating during the pandemic — [I look at] financial incentives and power dynamics that also help to account for what happened to us and why so many people went along with it.

    The control of the flow of information has been extremely important during the pandemic. I think without the government’s partnering with private entities in these vast censorship enterprises, we would not have adopted policies like lockdowns and school closures. We would’ve had much more pushback against policies like vaccine mandates than we saw.

    When you lock people down at home and so they’re isolated behind screens, forced to interact with one another only through this medium, they can’t have quiet face-to-face conversations at the watercooler, then you control the flow of information that they’re getting through the control of social media, the control of mainstream media.

    And then [when] you deploy very sophisticated high-level propaganda techniques — wartime propaganda techniques — and you deliberately deploy fear as a mechanism of control, then you create conditions where people go along with manifestly unjust policies, and not only are not troubled by that, but actually believe that they’re doing good.

    These things are framed as duties of a good citizen. And people who challenge these policies are immediately branded with, ‘You only care about money. You don’t care about not killing grandma,’ this sort of thing.

    This desire to be a good person, this desire to be seen as among the virtuous because I’ve done what I’m told to do and I’ve done what it looks like everyone else is wanting to do or being told to do, this is a very powerful tonic that has proven to be very effective over the last three years.”

    Why We Must Understand the Big Picture

    October 23, 2022, Gates, Johns Hopkins and the World Health Organization cohosted yet another tabletop exercise dubbed “Catastrophic Contagion,” involving a novel pathogen called “severe epidemic enterovirus respiratory syndrome 2025” (SEERS-25), which primarily affects children and teens.

    When asked if he believes COVID-19 was a kind of fine-tuning of a process the globalist cabal intends to deploy in the future during another pandemic, he replies:

    “Monkeypox never took hold as the next crisis but, yes, I think we’ve adopted a new model of governance and this is what I argue in “The New Abnormal” — that even though a lot of these individual policies have been rolled back, some of the problematic policies that we’ve mentioned, the whole infrastructure for lockdowns, for digital surveillance through vaccine passport-type technology and through digital track and trace technology, this infrastructure has been put in place.

    It’s still in place and it’s just waiting for the next declared public health crisis. This new model of governance involves unprecedented level of control over people’s lives, their movements, their speech, their freedom of association, and it requires that we jump from one declared crisis to the next to keep this state of emergency going, so that certain people can maintain power … and continue to advance their aims.

    In Chapter 3 of the book, I talk about what some of the next steps are in the rollout of what I call a biosecurity or biomedical security paradigm — things like digital IDs tied to biometric data like your iris scan, your face ID, your fingerprint; eventually, data from wearables or implantable devices on your vital signs and your moment-to-moment health status or emotional status.

    Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) will be the financial arm of that monitoring, surveilling and controlling apparatus, so there’s going to be another declared public health crisis. You see an attempt to reframe other issues from racism to climate change as public health issues.

    People in positions of power have floated serious proposals to do rolling lockdowns to deal with the climate crisis, for example, or the energy crisis in Europe, so we’re going to see something.

    Whether it’s a computer virus or an enterovirus, a gastrointestinal bug that disproportionately impacts children — because children were largely spared from COVID and not enough parents vaccinated their children in the eyes of the biosecurity paradigm elites — I don’t know.

    I don’t know exactly what issue is going to be the one that takes hold, but there will be another declared public health crisis, sometime in the next two to three years, with attempts not only to revive COVID era policies and mechanisms of control, but to advance additional pieces in that regime. Of that, I have absolutely no doubt.

    One of the reasons I wrote the book … [was] to look toward the future and to ask, ‘OK, how is this apparatus, this biomedical security apparatus going to be deployed down the road, and what are the next steps in that process?’

    [I ask this ]so that we can realize that if we don’t start standing up for certain freedoms, if we don’t draw lines and say, ‘These are rights that should never be relinquished, even during an emergency or a declared crisis,’ if we don’t start doing that, and if we’re not aware of what the next steps in this process are going to be and how they’re going to be sold to us, then we’re going to find ourselves caught off guard once again.

    In a crisis where there’s fear and uncertainty, we’re not going to be able to think clearly. We’re going to lose our heads again and we’re going to wake up in a year or two or three and wonder, ‘How did we get here?

    What happened to us?’ and I don’t want to see that happen again. We’ve already relinquished enough of our freedoms, we’ve already endured the enormous collateral harms of our disastrous pandemic policies, and to my view, we can’t go down that road again in another few years.”

    Looking Ahead

    In the epilogue of the book, titled “Seattle 2030,” Kheriaty imagines what life might be like seven years from now, if we don’t change course.

    “What I do in the first half of the epilogue is try to give the reader a sense of how some of these new technologies and measures are going to be sold to the public, so the first couple of pages of the epilogue don’t seem dystopian …

    It’s only once you get about halfway through that you start seeing, ‘OK, there are some flies in the ointment, and there’s people in this society under this regime who are not benefiting, who are excluded by the social credit system and other mechanisms of social and financial control.’

    There are certainly health problems that are not being solved by twice-a-year mRNA injections, and probably being exacerbated by this model of treating human beings as though we’re hardware that needs software updates in the form of gene therapies.

    Hopefully, by the end of the epilogue, the reader wakes up and recognizes, ‘Oh, my goodness, this is not the kind of society that I want to live in. This is certainly not the kind of society that I want my children or my grandchildren to grow up in.’

    I didn’t invent any new technologies to describe in the epilogue … [I say] ‘A few years from now, if certain things that are readily available are adopted on a mass scale and deployed in particular ways, this is what your life is going to look like. Is this the kind of life that you want to lead?’

    So, it’s an attempt to bring together the future-oriented gaze of the book and help people really get a firm and concrete grasp of what’s coming down the pike if we don’t stand up and resist.”

    Is There a Way to Resist CBDC Implementation?

    I believe the implementation of CBDCs will be instrumental in the coming control scheme, because once the globalist cabal has direct access to your money, you become far easier to control. And, the way it’s looking right now, CBDCs are inevitable. The question is, how do we opt out of the system?

    “This is a really hard problem and it’s a really important question,” Kheriaty says. “I think we have to learn how to opt out of the system and develop, whether it’s a parallel economy or parallel medical institutions, that truly are independent.

    We have to do that right now, and we have to develop those things soon, because if we collectively get into an opt-in situation with digital IDs and CBDCs, then resistance to that system will be almost impossible …

    I think we need to start thinking small and local, and to develop strong face-to-face communities of communication, interaction, mutual support and exchange. The currency works because of a communal agreement that when I give you this piece of paper, it’s going to be worth something.

    It’s a mutual agreement that we’re going to use this mechanism of exchange, and this mechanism of measuring market value is how currency becomes currency.

    So, [as a] collective [we need to say] ‘No, we’re not going to go cashless.’ If as a collective, we say, ‘No, we’re not going to transition all of our assets into a centrally controlled digital currency,’ we’ll halt the process of that becoming the default or the only game in town.

    Beyond that, I wish I could tell you what the answer looks like and what these parallel economies are going to look like. I don’t know the answer to that, and part of the reason I don’t know the answer is because that’s not how novel solutions develop. Novel solutions don’t develop from a couple of perceptive or intelligent people figuring it all out.

    They require the collective wisdom of a lot of people trying things, some of which don’t work and some of which work. They require people at the local level asking, ‘What are the needs of the population here close to home?’ which may look very different from the needs of a population in a different setting or in a different context.”

    Past the Point of No Return, All Freedom Will Be Lost

    Kheriaty goes on to explain why getting out of the control system — once CBDCs are fully implemented and society has gone cashless — will be near-impossible:

    “CBDCs need to be distinguished from decentralized digital currencies like Bitcoin. The feds are issuing a digital dollar, and if that digital currency is adopted to the point where we’ve gone entirely cashless, then we’re in a situation in which you can be locked out of your ability to engage in financial transactions if you don’t comply or if you don’t behave.

    And, as I explain in the book, if you have a digital dollar in your digital wallet, it’s not actually the same as a dollar bill in your real wallet. The reason for that is, let’s say the government gives you $1,000 tax rebate in the form of a digital dollar. They may even sweeten the deal saying, ‘We’ll give you a $1,000 check in your bank account or we will give you $1,200 in the form of a digital dollar,’ right?

    ‘Oh, OK, I’ll take the digital dollar. That’s a no brainer. It’s more money.’ Well, two to three years from now, once we’ve gone cashless, that digital dollar can be programmed to have conditions attached to it.

    In other words, the government can say, ‘Here’s your tax rebate, but you got to spend this $1,200 sometime in the next nine months, and if you don’t, then it’s going to turn into $600. And if you don’t spend it in the next six months after that, it’s going to disappear.’

    So what you have in your digital wallet is not actually like cash. Cash doesn’t just disappear. It doesn’t have an expiration date on it. The government can also say, ‘You have to spend it on these favored industries.’

    Or, ‘You can’t spend it on these disfavored industries. You can’t give a donation or contribution to support Dr. McCullough’s podcast because he’s a disinformation spreader,’ or, ‘You have to spend it on green energy,’ or whatever.

    Once this is tied to a digital ID, the government will be able to track all of your financial transactions using this digital currency. It will be able to nudge you and punish you in the ways that I have described.

    If you try to opt out of that system, basically you’re not going to be able to engage in financial transactions, or you’re going to find yourself in some parallel economy that involves bartering chickens or something like that — very primitive kind of economic transactions — because all of the banks and all of society’s mainstream institutions are going to rely on this digital system of productivity and exchange and currency to engage in all transactions.

    So, once the system is in place, it’s going to be very hard to resist because an algorithm in the sky or a person can push a button and, look, you can no longer buy gasoline. You can no longer purchase things online unless you get your booster shot or unless you do what the public health authorities are telling you to do.

    So it’s a system of near total surveillance and control that would’ve made the totalitarian dictators of the past salivate. Hitler or Stalin could only have dreamed of this level of intrusive surveillance and minute control over the movements and the behavior of the populations that they were governing.”

    o

    More Information

    I completely agree with Kheriaty’s notion that it is imperative that people understand where we’re headed — that the COVID measures weren’t just responses to a given pandemic, but rather laid the foundation for a totalitarian one world government, where human rights and freedoms will no longer exist.

    This is likely the biggest challenge mankind has ever faced as a collective, and it requires strong collective resistance. In order for that resistance to occur, however, people must understand what’s going on. So, to learn more, be sure to pick up a copy of Kheriaty’s book, “The New Abnormal: The Rise of the Biomedical Security State,” and share it with friends and family.

  • MRNA – it’s a Gene Therapy & They Knew It

    MRNA – it’s a Gene Therapy & They Knew It

    MRNA – it’s a Gene Therapy & They Knew It

    Tom Renz

    I’m completely done with the discussion on this issue. There is no discussion. MRNA is a gene therapy product and the only reason anyone is questioning this is because big pharma paid off enough scientists to lie about this being a question. Pfizer, Moderna, and many other big pharma gangsters have acknowledged this in the past but Google has done everything possible to scrub it from the internet. While I have an immense amount of documentation on this from various sources I’m going to focus this article on a single Moderna document that I think provides enough evidence, on it’s own, to end this “dispute” which would not even exist if the corrupt media and fact checkers were not bought off by the same money as the corrupt scientists.

     

    Let me start by providing a copy of the Moderna 10k SEC filing that was provided to the SEC in March of 2019. Here it is:

    Moderna 10k 2019 Sec Filing
    3.5MB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    This is a lengthy document and not a fun read but starting on page 147 you will see a legally mandated discussion of “risk factors” to the company.

    Let’s fast forward to pages 148 and 149. I’ll let the following excerpt speak for itself:

    No mRNA drug has been approved in this new potential class of medicines, and may never be approved as a result of efforts by others or us. mRNA drug development has substantial clinical development and regulatory risks due to the novel and unprecedented nature of this new class of medicines.

    As a potential new class of medicines, no mRNA medicines have been approved to date by the FDA or other regulatory agency… Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA.

     

    Share

    This same section then goes on to attempt to differentiate mRNA gene therapy from others by suggesting that the gene alterations are designed not to be permanent, but the document recognizes throughout that this is an untested product and no one really has any idea what it will do. Before I discuss this allow me to also include this from page 156:

    Some of our investigational medicines are classified as gene therapies by the FDA and the EMA, and the FDA has indicated that our investigational medicines will be reviewed within its Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, or CBER. Even though our mRNA investigational medicines are designed to have a different mechanism of action from gene therapies, the association of our investigational medicines with gene therapies could result in increased regulatory burdens, impair the reputation of our investigational medicines, or negatively impact our platform or our business.

    There have been few approvals of gene therapy products in the United States or foreign jurisdictions, and there have been well-reported significant adverse events associated with their testing and use. Gene therapy products have the effect of introducing new DNA and potentially irreversibly changing the DNA in a cell. In contrast, mRNA is highly UNLIKELY [emphasis added] to localize to the nucleus…

    In the EU, mRNA has been characterized as a Gene Therapy Medicinal Product.

     

    Give a gift subscription

    Here again note that mRNA is a gene therapy that is “highly unlikely” to localize in the nucleus but untested and is again recognized as a gene therapy medicinal product (NOT A VACCINE).

    The risk factors to Moderna discussed throughout this document are shocking and most of the biggest come down to the risk of developing and getting approval for a new category of drug that has the potential to permanently alter your DNA and is already considered a gene therapy. The actual development cycle for this type of drug would be in the vicinity of 10-20 years and that is for good reason. The idea of putting something in your body that could permanently change the building blocks of your humanity (your DNA) is a very big deal and exceedingly complex but… but… let’s not overlook the fact that Fauci and others were involved with Moderna and likely receiving royalty payments. This was the key to what occurred.

    I would propose the following. The WEF and big pharma have been exceedingly keen on promoting gene therapies for many years. MRNA was a vehicle to accomplishing this goal. No one wanted these products, but the globalists wanted to sell them because they saw HUGE money in this (and possibly a vehical to accomplish many far more nefarious purposes). I’ll leave a full conversation on the motivations for this to another article but believe that the promotion of a relatively mild disease (COVID was overhyped and but for the constant misdiagnosis due to financial incentives and the denial of early treatment would have resulted in a case fatality rate that may have been lower than the yearly flu) as the end of the world was done to provide cover for corrupt officials using “emergency law” to bypass proper safety protocols.

    Get a group subscription

    Debra Birx has repeatedly admitted to lying to Trump about everything COVID and there is little doubt Fauci and the rest did the same. Trump was a brilliant leader but not a scientist and leaders have to rely on their support staff. He did but the staff was corrupt and promoted the idea of “Operation Warp Speed” so they could “work their tails off” and push out these experimental shots that ended up being death jabs. This was an incredible set-up as it put the same corrupt bureaucrats in a position where they and big pharma could then try and blame Trump for the inevitable failures and deaths caused by pushing a rushed gene therapy product to the market without any real proof of what it would do (though our evidence suggests they knew a LOT more about the dangers of these products than has been publicly disclosed at this point).

    Regardless of my speculation about the greater plan or purpose, there is ZERO question that these jabs are and were always a gene therapy. Despite a corrupt media and bunch of bought off scientists changing their tune after receiving big checks, Moderna explicitly acknowledged this fact. Pfizer and others have done the same in other paperwork I have (I’ll save that for another Substack).

    If you received these shots thinking they were vaccines, you were lied to. It is just that simple and the problems you are or will have from them are a direct result of what appears to have been an incredibly complex and corrupt plan to push this new and untested category of drugs onto the global public – regardless of the costs to life and safety.

  • Alt media warned about everything happening today… now we’ve decoded the playbook on what happens next in the EXTERMINATION AGENDA targeting humanity

    Alt media warned about everything happening today… now we’ve decoded the playbook on what happens next in the EXTERMINATION AGENDA targeting humanity

    (Natural News) We in the alt media (the truth media) have accurately predicted and warned about almost everything the world is seeing today: Widespread vaccine injuries and deaths, worsening inflation and currency devaluation, government instigated censorship, mass uprisings, depopulation and worsening infertility, and so much more.

    The alt media / independent media is the real media. We are the ones willing to speak truth to power, to ask tough questions and to exercise independent thinking rather than blind obedience to contrived narratives dished out by lying liars.

    After calling all this in advance and warning the world about what was coming (and what’s already here now), we are now warning about what comes next.

    What we are witnessing and living through is nothing less than the planned fall of human civilization and a planetary-scale ethnic cleansing genocide against humanity.

    Only by understanding this critical point can we make sense of the events being unleashed today:

    • Aggressive pushing of vaccine bioweapons that maim or kill
    • Skyrocketing infertility rates among vaccine-compliant countries
    • Accelerating food inflation that will lead to widespread hunger and famine
    • Attempt at total government control over all speech through censorship and de-platforming
    • An engineered collapse of the purchasing power of fiat currencies (heading into a “reset” of money)
    • Geoengineering (weather weaponization) to disrupt food production and create crisis
    • Intentional escalation into World War III by provoking Russia through the proxy nation of Ukraine
    • The deliberate takedown of the food supply chain through mass culling of cattle, chickens and turkeys

     

    Observed through the understanding of the genocide agenda, all the major events taking place today no longer appear as random, spontaneous “bad luck” events but rather as milestones in a much larger, far more nefarious plan.

    That plan — which we believe will fail, by the way — is the attempted extermination of billions of human beings. It is an attempt to prepare planet Earth for a “post-human future.”

    Globalists believe humans will soon be obsolete

    Understand that even without invoking cosmic explanations or demonic forces, globalists already perceive the human masses as obsolete, ready to be replaced by AI computing systems (to replace service jobs such as telemedicine, tech support, customer service, etc.) and eventually AI-embedded bipedal humanoid robots (to replace labor in agriculture, transportation, warehouse jobs and so on).

    Globalists see human beings as a “human resource” to be exploited, then discarded. After taxing and enslaving the working masses for centuries, the era of humans as the source of labor, ideas and communications is rapidly coming to an end. AI systems such as ChatGPT can already replace many text or voice-based human interactions, including medical interactions. Pill-pushing doctors are already obsolete, as an AI medical system produces nearly the exact same results. Soon, companies like Google and Amazon will roll out robotic systems that replace a vast percentage of human laborers, and many fast food restaurants are already buying automated systems that replace humans.

    In the near future, there will hardly be any humans working at an Amazon warehouse facility. It will be something like 98% robots and 2% humans, just to handle the problems that robots can’t yet figure out.

    What will globalists do with all the billions of unemployed, obsolete masses? It’s simple: They exterminate them.

    Hence the need for clot shot vaccines, infertility mRNA injections, collapsed food supply infrastructure, an engineered currency collapse, government-run censorship and other similar efforts. These are all vectors to help globalists achieve annihilation of the human race by collapsing the very things that keep civilization functioning (such as food, fertilizer, fossil fuels, a power grid, fair elections and so on).

    The breakdowns aren’t accidents

    Importantly, many human beings living today are losing their minds trying to understand why everything is breaking. Food is increasingly scarce. Diesel fuel is more expensive. Supply chains are broken. Infrastructure is crumbling. The FAA can’t even keep planes in the air and had a total system failure earlier today, grounding all flights in the USA. But this isn’t happening due to bad luck. It’s happening on purpose. It is being inflicted upon humanity.

    The complicit governments of the world — largely run by the WEF and the CCP — have become terrorist organizations pursuing the goal of exterminating their own people. That’s why traitorous Lloyd Austin forced vaccines upon active duty military personnel. It wasn’t to make them healthy but to maim and murder them in preparation for the weakening of America’s defenses and coming world war. Austin is, in my opinion, a war criminal far worse than Benedict Arnold. He mass murdered his own troops in order to weaken America and make sure America’s enemies succeed when World War III get initiated (probably soon).

    Learn more in today’s Situation Update podcast, which explains much more:

    – NYC grocery stores are locking up food due to rising retail theft
    – Food retailers are FLEEING blue cities as crime skyrockets
    – Foster Farms sounds alarm over MILLIONS of cattle and chickens about to STARVE due to lack of grain shipments via rail
    – US rail system is collapsing, and deliveries of food and fertilizer are deliberately disrupted
    – Houston hero who shot violent armed robber subjected to grand jury
    – Brought to you by Pfizer
    – Predictions and warnings that alt media NAILED
    – What’s going to happen next:
    – Russia to launch major offensive against Ukraine and NATO
    – Controlled demolition of the debt-based fiat currency system
    – Accelerated dismantling of the energy infrastructure to impoverish humanity
    – Geoengineering (weather weaponization) unleashed to destroy the food supply chain
    – Humans to be replaced by AI systems, followed by AI humanoid robots (terminators)
    – The big COSMIC picture of humanity being targeted for extermination

    Citizen News

    Rumble: Rumble.com/v24vkcg-situation-update-11123-we-have-decoded-the-luciferian-globalist-playbook….html

    Bitchute: Bitchute.com/video/EhVno3lpAGto/

    Banned.Video: Banned.video/watch?id=63bea37b85dfe912ff5b7492

    iTunes podcast: Healthrangerreport.com/situation-update-jan-11-2023-we-have-decoded-the-luciferian-globalist-playbook-to-exterminate-the-human-race

  • Why Has COVID Spared Africa?

    Why Has COVID Spared Africa?

    STORY AT-A-GLANCE

    • There are clear contradictions between the World Health Organization’s directives regarding the need for COVID shots in Africa and the actual situation on the ground
    • The WHO is still calling on all countries to get the COVID jab into at least 70% of their populations, and warns that developing countries are at grave risk due to low jab rates. Meanwhile, Africa, where less than 6% of the population is jabbed, has fared far better than countries with high injection rates. A large-scale survey in Uganda also shows COVID is no longer a clinical issue
    • Variants have also gotten milder (less pathogenic) with each iteration, yet the WHO warns that new variants may create “large waves of serious disease and death in populations with low vaccination coverage”
    • The explanation for the disconnect between the WHO’s priorities and what’s happening in Africa can be explained when you look at the focus of the WHO’s Catastrophic Contagion exercise. It focused on getting African leadership trained in following the pandemic script. The WHO needs additional pandemics in order to justify its pandemic treaty, which will give it sole power to dictate countermeasures, and it needs to eliminate the African control group, which shows the COVID “vaccines” do more harm than good
    • The WHO also has every intention of implementing climate lockdowns once it has the power to do so. To that aim, the WHO’s director of Environment and Health has suggested combining health and climate issues into one

    In the video above, John Campbell, Ph.D., a retired nurse educator, compares the contradictions between the World Health Organization’s directives regarding the need for COVID shots in Africa and the actual situation on the ground.

    As of December 12, 2022, the WHO was still calling on all countries to get the COVID jab into at least 70% of their populations.1 Its original deadline for meeting this 70% threshold was mid-2022, but by June 2022, only 58 of 194 member states had reached this target.2

    According to the WHO, jab supplies, technical support and financial support were lacking during the early days of the injection campaign but, now, those obstacles have been resolved. As a result, all countries now have the ability to meet the global target of 70%.

    Low Jab Rates Threaten Low-Income Countries, WHO Claims

    The “overarching challenge” right now is the administration of the shots, actually “getting shots into arms.”3 To address that, the WHO suggests integrating COVID-19 injection services “with other immunization services and alongside other health and social interventions.” This, they say, will maximize impact and “build long-term capacity.”

    The WHO also stresses that “As people’s risk perception of the virus wanes, careful risk communication and community engagement plans need to be adapted to enhance demand for vaccination.” To ensure low-income countries get onboard to meet the 70% target, the WHO also launched The COVID-19 Vaccine Delivery Partnership in January 2022.

    This is an international effort “to intensify country readiness and delivery support” in 34 countries with low COVID jab uptake. Partners include UNICEF, Gavi and the World Bank. According to the WHO:4

    “Despite incremental success since its launch in January 2022, low and lower-middle income countries are facing difficulties to get a step change in vaccination rates.

    This represents a serious threat to the fragile economic recovery, including due to the risk of new variants creating large waves of serious disease and death in populations with low vaccination coverage.

    It also means accelerating the delivery of other COVID-19 tools and treatments is a crucial priority to help the world build up multiple layers of protection against the virus. Concerted and urgent action from countries, international partners and agencies, along with G20 Finance Ministers is required to increase vaccination levels and expedite access.”

    In short, the WHO is really concerned that countries with low COVID jab rates will suffer lest they meet or exceed the target goal of jabbing 70% of their populations. But what is that concern based on? Certainly not the real world.

    WHO’s Statements Contradict Real-World Situations

    The statements made by the WHO contradict a number of real-world situations. For starters, while developed nations with high jab rates struggled with COVID-19 throughout much of 2021 and 2022, Africa avoided this fate, despite its single-digit jab rate.

    Scientists are said to be “mystified” as to how Africa fared so well, completely ignoring data showing that the more COVID shots you get, the higher your risk of contracting COVID and ending up in the hospital.

    Over the past year, researchers have been warning that the COVID jabs appear to be dysregulating and actually destroying people’s immune systems, leaving them vulnerable not only to COVID but also other infections.5 It stands to reason, then, that Africa with its low injection rate would not be burdened with COVID cases brought on by dysfunctional immune systems.

    Secondly, variants have gotten milder (less pathogenic) with each iteration, albeit more infectious (i.e., they spread easier). So why is the WHO worried about “the risk of new variants creating large waves of serious disease and death in populations with low vaccination coverage”? What is that “risk” based on?

    And, since COVID infection keeps getting milder, and has had a lethality on par with or lower than influenza6,7,8,9,10 ever since mid-2020 at the latest, why is it still a “crucial priority” to accelerate delivery of COVID treatments?

    As a reminder, according to a September 2, 2020 study in Annals of Internal Medicine, the overall noninstitutionalized infection fatality ratio for COVID was a mere 0.26%. Below 40 years of age, the infection fatality ratio was just 0.01%. Meanwhile, the estimated infection fatality rate for seasonal influenza is 0.8%.11

    Report From Uganda

    Campbell goes on to cite a large-scale survey by a community health partner in Uganda, which surveyed doctors, nurses and medical officers across the country, and “basically, they don’t see any COVID anymore,” he says.

    They’re not getting the jab and they’re not getting tested for COVID either. There’s no need, because no one is getting sick with COVID — at least not to the point they need medical attention.

    The Ugandan government has even stopped publishing COVID guidelines. From their perspective, the pandemic is over. The same sentiment appears common in other African countries as well. Given the situation on the ground, is it really a pressing need to jab 30 million people in Uganda against a disease they’re not getting sick from?

    What Uganda does need is malaria treatments, mosquito nets, clean drinking water and antibiotics. “That is what the priorities on the ground seem to be,” Campbell says. So, what’s with the apparent disconnect between the WHO’s priorities and what’s actually happening in areas with low COVID jab rates? The WHO’s Catastrophic Contagion exercise12,13 clues us in.

    The Disconnect Reveals the WHO’s True Intentions

    October 23, 2022, the WHO, Bill Gates and Johns Hopkins cohosted a global challenge exercise dubbed “Catastrophic Contagion,”14,15 involving the outbreak of a novel pathogen called “severe epidemic enterovirus respiratory syndrome 2025” (SEERS-25).

    Tellingly, this tabletop exercise was focused on getting African leadership involved and trained in following the pandemic script. Participants included 10 current and former health ministers and senior public health officials from Senegal, Rwanda, Nigeria, Angola and Liberia. (Representatives from Singapore, India and Germany, as well as Gates himself, were also in attendance.)

    African nations just so happened to go “off script” more often than others during the COVID pandemic and didn’t follow in the footsteps of developed nations when it came to pushing the jabs. As a result, vaccine makers now face the problem of having a huge control group, as the COVID jab uptake on the African continent was only 6%.16

    They cannot reasonably explain how or why Africa ended up faring so better than developed nations with high COVID jab rates in terms of COVID-19 infections and related deaths.17

    The WHO desperately needs to get rid of this control group, so they’re enlisting and training African leaders how to push for widespread vaccination using the WHO’s talking points. This, I believe, is the only reason the WHO is still speaking about COVID-19 in catastrophic terms.

    The WHO Needs Additional Pandemics to Secure Its Power Grab

    At this point, it’s quite clear that “biosecurity” is the chosen means by which the globalist cabal intends to usher in its one world government. The WHO is working on securing sole power over pandemic response globally through its international pandemic treaty which, if implemented, will eradicate the sovereignty of member nations.

    The WHO’s pandemic treaty is basically the gateway to a global, top-down totalitarian regime. But to secure that power, they will need more pandemics. COVID-19 alone was not enough to get everyone onboard with a centralized pandemic response unit, and they probably knew that from the start.

    So, the reason we can be sure there will be additional pandemics, whether manufactured using fear and hype alone or an actual bioweapon created for this very purpose, is because the takeover plan, aka The Great Reset, is based on the premise that we need global biosecurity surveillance and a centralized response.

    Biosecurity, in turn, is the justification for an international vaccine passport, which the G20 just signed on to, and that passport will also be your digital identification. That digital ID, then, will be tied to your social credit score, personal carbon footprint tracker, medical records, educational records, work records, social media presence, purchase records, your bank accounts and a programmable central bank digital currency (CBDC).

    Once all these pieces are fully connected, you’ll be in a digital prison, and the ruling cabal — whether officially a one world government by then or not — will have total control over your life from cradle to grave.

    The WHO’s pandemic treaty is what sets this chain of events off, as it will have the power to implement vaccine passports globally once the treaty is signed. The WHO will also have the power to mandate vaccines, standardize medical care and issue travel restrictions.

    This treaty will likely pass this year, which means the WHO will either need to ramp up the COVID narrative again, or switch to another pandemic in order to justify these kinds of actions.

    The Pandemic Treaty Is the Death Knell to Freedom Worldwide

    It’s important to realize that the WHO’s pandemic treaty will radically alter the global power structure and strip you of some of your most basic rights and freedoms. It’s a direct attack on the sovereignty of its member states, as well as a direct attack on your bodily autonomy.

    Once signed, all member nations will be subject to the WHO’s dictates. If the WHO says every person on the planet needs to have a vaccine passport and digital identity to ensure vaccination compliance, then that’s what every country will be forced to implement, even if the people have rejected such plans using local democratic processes.

    There’s also reason to suspect the WHO intends to extend its sovereign leadership into the health care systems of every nation, eventually implementing a universal or “socialist-like” health care system as part of The Great Reset. WHO Director-General Tedros has previously stated that his “central priority” as director-general of the WHO is to push the world toward universal health coverage.18

    Prediction: Climate Lockdowns Are Next

    Considering the WHO changed its definition of “pandemic” to “a worldwide epidemic of a disease,”19 without the original specificity of severe illness that causes high morbidity,20,21 just about anything could be made to fit the pandemic criterion. This means that once they’re in power, they won’t need to rely exclusively on pathogenic threats.

    They could also declare a global pandemic for a noninfectious threat, like global warming, for example. Such a declaration would then allow the WHO to circumvent laws that are in place to preserve our freedom, and allow for the implementation of tyrannical measures such as lockdowns and travel restrictions.

    Indeed, the notion of “climate lockdowns” has already been publicly flouted on multiple occasions.22 As reported by The Pulse:23

    “Climate lockdowns and other restrictions will be framed as saving the people of the world from themselves. Who would ever disagree with such measures when it is framed under the guise of good will?

    Like we saw with COVID mandates, if climate mandates ever take place they will be promoted as an extremely noble and necessary action. Those who disagree and present evidence that such actions are not useful or impactful, and instead cause more harm, will most likely be silenced, censored and ridiculed …

    What would a climate lockdown look like? Well, if such an initiative were to take place, governments would limit or ban the consumption of many foods. They would ban or limit private-vehicle use, or limit the distance one can travel in a gas powered car or perhaps even by plane.

    Working from home could eventually become the permanent norm if special carbon taxes are put in place. Such taxes could be imposed on companies, limiting driving or air miles, and extend to individual employees … Schools, especially those heavily influenced by teachers’ unions, could impose permanent online-only days.”

    Officials Around the World Have Suggested Climate Lockdowns

    As noted by The Pulse, a number of officials around the world have voiced support for climate lockdowns, completely ignoring the devastating effects the COVID lockdowns have already had. This just goes to show lockdowns were never about public health and never will be.

    Among the climate lockdown enthusiasts we have Germany’s health minister Karl Lauterbach, who in December 2020 proclaimed that addressing climate change would require restrictions on personal freedom, similar to those implemented to “flatten the curve” of COVID.24

    British economics professor Mariana Mazzucato is another advocate for climate lockdowns, who in September 2020 warned that “In the near future, the world may need to resort to lockdowns again — this time to tackle a climate emergency.”25

    We also have the statements of Bill Gates26 and the Red Cross,27 both of which in 2020 claimed that climate change poses a greater threat to mankind than COVID, and must be confronted with the same urgency and resolve. The World Economic Forum (WEF), the United Nations and the WHO have also published articles stating their intent to “fight climate change” by shutting down society.28

    Notably, in “How to Fight the Next Threat to Our World: Air Pollution,” published by the WEF29 and co-written by the director of WHO’s Environment and Health Department, it’s suggested that health and climate issues be combined into one. As noted in that article:

    “We can confront these crises more effectively and fairly if we address them as one — and foster support across all sectors of the economy … COVID-19 has proven humanity’s inbuilt ability to rise up and act to protect the health of our most vulnerable people. We need to do the same with air pollution.”

    Recall, as I mentioned above, if the WHO has sole power over global health, combining health and climate issues will automatically give the WHO the de facto power to issue climate lockdowns. Some claim climate lockdowns have already begun,30 with the random shutting off of people’s power even though there’s no actual outage — sort of slow-walking people into accepting that the lights won’t always turn on.

    That the WHO will jump at the opportunity to implement climate lockdowns can also be seen in the WHO Manifesto for a Healthy Recovery From COVID-19, which states:31

    “The ‘lockdown’ measures that have been necessary to control the spread of COVID-19 have slowed economic activity, and disrupted lives — but have also given some glimpses of a possible brighter future.

    In some places, pollution levels have dropped to such an extent that people have breathed clean air, or have seen blue skies and clear waters, or have been able to walk and cycle safely with their children — for the first times in their lives.

    The use of digital technology has accelerated new ways of working and connecting with each other, from reducing time spent commuting, to more flexible ways of studying, to carrying out medical consultations remotely, to spending more time with our families.

    Opinion polls from around the world show that people want to protect the environment, and preserve the positives that have emerged from the crisis, as we recover …

    Decisions made in the coming months can either “lock in” economic development patterns that will do permanent and escalating damage to the ecological systems that sustain all human health and livelihoods, or, if wisely taken, can promote a healthier, fairer, and greener world.”

    This manifesto also lays out many other aspects of The Great Reset agenda, including smart cities, travel restrictions, new food systems, a complete transition to green energy and more. But again, the thing that will really facilitate all of these changes is to have a centralized powerbase, and that is the WHO.

    What Can You Do?

    Stopping the WHO pandemic treaty will be difficult, as the World Health Assembly may or may not even accept public comment before making a decision. Your best bet right now is to sign up for the World Council for Health’s (WCH) newsletter.

    The last time the World Health Assembly met to discuss the treaty, the WCH issued links and instructions on how to submit your comment. You can subscribe at the bottom of this page, or on the WCH’s home page. I and the CHD will also share details if they become available, so subscribing to our newsletters can give you a heads-up as well.

    In the absence of instructions, you could reach out to your respective delegation and request that they oppose the treaty. A list of U.S. delegates can be found in James Roguski’s Substack article, “Speaking Truth to Power.”

    For contact information for other nations’ delegates, I would suggest contacting the regional office and ask for a list (see “Regions” in the blue section at the bottom of the World Health Assembly’s webpage).

  • Pfizer’s Shots Aren’t Safe and Were Never Shown to Be

    Pfizer’s Shots Aren’t Safe and Were Never Shown to Be

    STORY AT-A-GLANCE

    • Dr. Kathryn Edwards, a member of Pfizer’s data safety monitoring board (DSMB), was previously a paid adviser to Pfizer. DSMBs are supposed to be independent, and aren’t if members have previous relationships with the company
    • German autopsies found “highly unusual tissue inflammation” in people who died shortly after getting the jab, and investigators suspect the inflammation observed would be fatal. They also found spike protein in the tissues of the deceased, but not another key part of SARS-CoV-2. This suggests the actual virus was not part of the problem; the only possible source of the spike protein was the jab
    • Data from the German health insurance provider BKK, which covers about 10.9 million Germans, show 2.05% of COVID jab recipients sought medical care after their jab
    • The largest German statutory health insurance dataset, which encompasses 72 million Germans, show massive increases in sudden and unexpected deaths after the COVID jabs rolled out
    • December 13, 2022, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis petitioned the Florida Supreme Court for a statewide grand jury investigation of crimes and wrongdoing committed against Floridians related to the COVID-19 jabs. He also established an independent Public Health Integrity Committee to analyze and assess federal health guidance before they’re implemented in Florida

    Contrary to the official narrative (and hence popular belief), the COVID shots have no demonstrated safety. In Episode 298 of The Highwire, Del Bigtree interviews attorney Aaron Siri about the various lawsuits his firm has brought to reverse COVID jab mandates.

    Siri describes a recent deposition of Dr. Kathryn Edwards, a world-leading vaccinologist who sat on Pfizer’s data safety monitoring board (DSMB). This five-member committee oversaw the safety of Pfizer’s jab. A DSMB is supposed to be an independent group of experts, whose responsibility it is to monitor patient safety and treatment efficacy data while a clinical trial is ongoing.

    Pfizer’s Not-so-Independent Safety Monitoring Board

    As noted by Siri in the deposition, since the DSMB is supposed to be independent, it’s crucially important that all the members of that board have no potential conflicts of interest and are in fact truly independent of the drug company whose product they’re evaluating.

    In the case of Edwards, she was a paid adviser to Pfizer before she was hired (by Pfizer) to be on the DSMB for their COVID jab. According to Edwards, this fact is irrelevant, because that prior relationship did not influence the work she did on the board.

    “I say what I believe based on my expertise,” she told Siri. “So, you don’t think financial incentive can sway people’s judgment at all?” Siri asked. “It does not sway my judgment, Sir,” she replied. “Then why have an independent DSMB?” Siri asked. “Why doesn’t Pfizer just have some of its employees on it?”

    “Because we are independent; we are independent from Pfizer in this assessment,” she replied. But just how can an independent advisory committee possibly be “independent” if members have prior relationships with the company?

    Another noteworthy tidbit from that deposition was Edwards’ comment that she reviewed “lots of reactions and adverse events” from the COVID jab trial. Yet the public has continuously been told there are no bad reactions. So, what was she looking at? And why, if there were “lots of reactions,” did the DSMB conclude that there are no safety concerns?

    Of course, we know at least some of what she was looking at. Pfizer trial documents1 have been released showing the company amassed nine single-spaced pages’ worth of “adverse events of special interest” (see pages 30 through 382), including 1,223 events with fatal outcomes between December 1, 2020 and February 28, 2021 alone.

    A whistleblower who worked on Pfizer’s Phase 3 trial has also come forward with evidence showing data were falsified, patients were unblinded and follow-up on reported side effects lagged way behind. Why didn’t any of these issues concern the DSMB? Was it because there really was no independent DSMB?

    What German Autopsy Data Have Revealed

    In a mid-December 2022 Substack article, the anonymous writer who goes by the moniker “A Midwestern Doctor” reviewed German autopsy data, which demonstrate:3

    • The presence of “highly unusual tissue inflammation” in people who died shortly after getting the jab. As noted by the author, “Pathologists had not observed this phenomena before the COVID-19 vaccines, and they suspected this inflammation would be fatal.”
    • The presence of COVID spike protein in the tissues of the deceased, whereas another key part of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was absent. This suggests the actual virus was not part of the problem; the only possible source of the spike protein was the jab.

    The most recent and “most definitive” study on this subject, according to A Midwestern Doctor, examined 35 people who died within 20 days of getting the COVID jab. After thorough autopsy examination, 10 of the deceased were determined to have died from causes other than the jab.

    Among the remaining 25, most died from causes that, in general, have frequently been linked to vaccination. Five died from myocarditis, which could potentially be linked to the shot. In three of those five cases, the COVID jab was determined to be the definitive cause of the myocarditis that led to their death.

    As noted by A Midwestern Doctor, “These results are very important for convicting the vaccines if it can also be proven that a large number of unexpected deaths are occurring following vaccination.” As it turns out, that’s exactly what excess mortality data tell us.

    German Insurance Provider Data Show Rise in Doctor’s Visits

    A Midwestern Doctor also cites data from the German health insurance provider, BKK, which covers about 10.9 million Germans. One of the BKK board members, Andreas Shöfbeck, discovered concerning trends in their data, which he sent to the Paul-Ehrlich Institut, an agency of the German Federal Ministry of Health.

    No good deed goes unpunished in the era of COVID censorship, however, so Shöfbeck was summarily dismissed from the board as thanks for his contribution to public health and safety. The BKK dataset showed 2.05% of COVID jab recipients sought medical care after their jab. A Midwestern Doctor continues:4

    “This concerning safety signal prompted … the AfD [Alternative for Germany, a conservative political party] … to file the German equivalent of FOIA [Freedom of Information Act request] for the rest of the insurance data …

    Recently AfD obtained AOK Sachsen-Anhalt’s data, which once analyzed, demonstrated that many of the conditions we associate with COVID-19 injuries noticeably increased when the vaccination campaign initiated … [C]onditions which rose five-fold or more were:”

    conditions associated with COVID-19

    “AfD also submitted a FOIA request to KBV, the association which represents all physicians who receive insurance in Germany and thus the largest insurance dataset available.”

    Largest Insurance Dataset Reveal Rise in Sudden Deaths

    The larger statutory health insurance dataset from KBV, which encompasses 72 million Germans, show massive increases in sudden and unexpected deaths after the COVID jabs rolled out.

    The following graph is from a press conference presentation by data analyst Tom Lausen (see video below; it’s in German, but you can enable English subtitles).5 No mainstream media attended the press conference.

    experimental covid vaccines

    As noted by A Midwestern Doctor:6

    “… one way that individuals have analyzed the unusual changes in health following the vaccination campaigns has been to assess how far they fall outside of the expected range of variation …

    I did a quick calculation for the above graph and found that 2021’s increase from 2016-2020 was 37.7σ [sigma], while 2022’s was 41.0σ. This is quite a big deal (the rarity of an event happening by chance increases exponentially as the σ increases).

    For context, a 7σ event has a 1/390,632,286,180 chance of spontaneously occurring (it is thought to occur once in a billion years) … (I was not able to find a reference on the probabilities for the even higher σ events observed here).

    Given these numbers, it is very difficult to argue that these events were not caused by something. In this regard, we are also quite fortunate that while the vaccines were rushed to the market over a period of time far too short to establish safety, that process still took a year.

    Because of this lag, it is possible to refute the commonly cited argument that these changes were due to COVID-19 or the lockdowns, as these only occurred in 2020 …”

    Dramatic Rise in Heart-Related Fatalities

    Lausen also presented a graph for German fatalities per quarter involving cardiac problems.7,8 These six death certificate codes all correspond to “sudden deaths” with cardiac cause. As you can see, heart-related mortality more than doubled in the first quarter of 2021 from the year before, and nearly tripled from the five-year average.

    german fatalities

    Some have argued that since few shots were given in early 2021, heart-related deaths would not have increased until the second quarter if there was a correlation between the two. However, other data show there was a rapid rise in COVID jab doses administered during the first quarter of 2021 (see graph below), so it’s not outside the realm of possibility that there is a correlation.

    Also, as with all-cause mortality, the fact that heart-related deaths did NOT spike during 2020 suggests COVID-19 had nothing to do with the rise that occurred in the first quarter of 2021.

    daily COVID-19 vaccine doses administered

    Data Analyst Calls for Immediate End to COVID Jabs

    In the conclusion of his presentation, Lausen calls for the immediate suspension of the COVID jabs until correlation between the shots and death can be conclusively ruled out. He also calls for:9

    • Autopsies on all who died suddenly to determine what the massive increase is due to
    • Mandatory recording of the COVID jab status of all deceased individuals, and the brand used, and regular publication of these data
    • Immediate evaluation of the KBV data by German health authorities
    • Informing all doctors and the population at large about the increase in diseases being reported post-jab
    • Regular publication of KB e V data linked with COVID jab data held by the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the Robert Koch Institute (Germany’s public health institute)

    The Shots Also Have Negative Effectiveness

    In addition to not being safe, by any standard, the COVID shots are also negatively effective, meaning after 90 days, both Moderna’s and Pfizer’s shots make you more susceptible to COVID.

    As shown in the graphic below, Danish data reveal Omicron cases among the jabbed rose dramatically after three months for both injections, giving Pfizer a negative effectiveness of 76.5% at 90 days’ post-jab and Moderna a 39.3% negative effectiveness.

    pfizer moderna negative effectiveness

    As noted in a series of Twitter posts by Chris Martenson Ph.D.:10

    “If you’ve been vaccinated, and feel like you’ve been getting sick more often than your unvaccinated friends, your impression is correct … The only rational, scientific, ethical, and moral response is to #StoptheShotsNow for everyone under 50 who is healthy. Anything less is profiteering, politics, or personal failure. Or assault and/or homicide if you’re a doctor.”

  • Keys to unlock the mystery of why Trump pushed the vaccines

    Keys to unlock the mystery of why Trump pushed the vaccines

    https://stopworldcontrol.com/trumpkeys/

    The following key insights will unlock the door of confusion to a brighter world of understanding and hope

    Trump was asked to run for president by high level military intelligence services who are fighting against world tyranny. Trump’s background in the inner circles of the cabal, and his decision to not go along with their evil plans, gave him insider knowledge needed to take them down.

    He was informed that the pandemic was coming, and learned that the cabal’s plan was to have two full years of ongoing lockdowns.

    This would wipe out the economies of the world and pave the way for a Great Reset, resulting in permanent worldwide tyranny. The agenda was to suppress all treatments for the pandemic disease – because the world must stay in lockdown for two years. After those two years, a vaccine would be released.

    The pandemic agenda

    ✔︎ Release the pandemic 

    ✔︎ Suppress all treatments 

    ✔︎ Two years of lockdowns 

    ✔︎ Devastate the nations 

    ✔︎ Wipe out the middle class 

    ✔︎ Impoverish all people 

    ✔︎ Transfer all resources to the cabal

    ✔︎ Make humanity dependent on them 

    ✔︎ Release vaccines after two years of lockdowns

    ✔︎ Be praised as the “saviors” of the world

    ✔︎ Establish permanent worldwide tyranny

     

    Trump and his allies were aware of this agenda, yet had no way of stopping it. The cabal had prepared their plan for decades, and had everything in place: government agencies, health organizations, news media, mind-controlled population, every little detail…

    The heart of the agenda was the two years of lockdowns to destroy the world. This had to be prevented by all means. There was only one way to end the lockdowns: a vaccine. 150 years of non-stop mind control of humanity had convinced virtually every single soul on earth that a vaccine is the one and only thing that protects them from illness.

    Mankind demanded a vaccine. They would not accept anything else.

    Trump could not change the minds of billions of brainwashed people. Stating publicly that vaccines are bad would destroy his credibility, and he would thereby waste all chances of saving America and the world. So Trump actually gave orders to work on vaccines prior to the pandemic. His goal was to cut the lockdowns short by releasing the vaccine far ahead of the cabal timeline. This would accomplish two objectives:

    1) Save America and the world from destruction

    2) Force the cabal to rush their agenda, which causes critical errors as they expose themselves

    It was the only option. Nothing could prevent the vaccines. Mankind demanded them. They would have been released anyway.  All Trump could do was pull them forward to thwart the plans of the cabal. Meanwhile, he fiercely opposed vaccine mandates, defended personal choice, and supported his allies who warned humanity about the dangers of the injections.

     

    Trump promoted treatments
    for months on end

    A central element of the cabal strategy was to hide all treatments. The WHO ordered all governments, news media, and social media to censor and ban information about treatments. Humanity was not allowed to have hope.  Everyone must be kept in total despair, locked down for two years, waiting for a vaccine.

    Trump smashed this plan by shouting from the rooftops that there were treatments.  He posted 26 tweets (!) about hydroxychloroquine and promoted doctors who use it.

    This is a list of the 26 (!) tweets in which Trump tried to tell humanity that a vaccine was not needed, because there are safe and very effective drugs.

    Trump also made personal videos in which he told the world about powerful therapeutics. He repeatedly told the world not to fear and not to let C0VID control their lives.

    Essentially Trump removed the need for a vaccine by saying there were cures. Who needs a rushed vaccine if there are proven drugs?  He promoted these drugs for many months. The significance of this evades most of us. The cabal insisted there were no cures, and governments worldwide banned every treatment. Trump severely disrupted their plan by touting cures, as loudly as he could, for months on end.

    Eventually, however, he had to do the inevitable: save America and the world from complete destruction by pulling the vaccine more than a year forward.

    Again: the vaccines were not his idea. They were the CABAL’s plan. He simply released them 1.5 years sooner to end the lockdowns, which saved the world.

    The genocide is not his fault. The adverse events are not his fault. All of this would have happened anyway, and far worse – on top of the total wipeout of America and all nations, followed by a tyrannical Great Reset.

    Keys to open our minds

    ✔︎ The vaccines would have come anyway 

    ✔︎ Trump had no way of preventing them 

    ✔︎ Humanity demanded a vaccine to end lockdowns 

    ✔︎ Trump pulled the agenda more than a year forward 

    ✔︎ By doing so, he saved the world from destruction 

    ✔︎ He constantly promoted cures
    which would eliminate the need for a vaccine 

    ✔︎ He constantly opposed the mandates 

    ✔︎ He said, “nobody has to be afraid of C0VID”

    ✔︎ He supports his allies who warn about the vaccines

    Recently Trump announced his plan to outlaw censorship, which means those who warn humanity about the vaccines will no longer be silenced. If he was on the side of the cabal, he wouldn’t be doing this, since a major message of patriots today is: stay away from the vaccines! 

    Imagine what will happen once all medical doctors worldwide are again able to warn humanity about vaccines!  That will be thanks to Trump. 

    May this insight help you to understand that Trump is not evil. He has been fighting an impossible war. Let’s learn to dig deeper, look beyond the surface and gain an accurate understanding.  Don’t listen to negative voices. 

    Look at this list of what Trump has been doing…

    ✔︎ Expose media corruption

    ✔︎ Expose government corruption

    ✔︎ Expose Big Pharma corruption

    ✔︎ Expose Big Tech corruption

    ✔︎ Expose FBI corruption

    ✔︎ Expose CIA corruption

    ✔︎ Expose DOJ corruption

    ✔︎ Expose DHS corruption

    ✔︎ Expose IRS corruption

    ✔︎ Expose election corruption

    ✔︎ Expose judiciary corruption

    ✔︎ Expose Supreme Court corruption

    ✔︎ Expose RINO corruption

    ✔︎ Expose the Deep State

    ✔︎ Expose the Cabal

    ✔︎ Expose child trafficking

    ✔︎ Expose the transgender agenda

    ✔︎ Expose border invasion

    ✔︎ Expose WHO crimes against humanity

    ✔︎ Expose WEF domination agenda

    ✔︎ Expose climate change hoax

    ✔︎ Expose New World Order

    ✔︎ Expose the “destroy America” agenda

    Trump has been doing nothing but exposing evil. Not only has he exposed all of it, but he is personally confronting it. That’s why he is constantly under attack.

    This is an incomplete list of the unrelenting attacks on Trump:

    ✔︎ Russian collusion hoax

    ✔︎ Two impeachment attempts

    ✔︎ Mass media slandering campaigns

    ✔︎ Facebook and Twitter accounts deleted

    ✔︎ Mass election fraud

    ✔︎ January 6th trap

    ✔︎ Kanye West set up

    ✔︎ Tax return investigation

    ✔︎ Constant public discrediting

    ✔︎ Controlled opposition accusations

    ✔︎ Republican Party betrayal

    During conferences of the World Economic Forum (the think tank of the cabal), Trump was repeatedly named as the greatest threat to their plan. George Soros called Trump their number 1 enemy.

    The message of the dark realm has been from the beginning: “Hate Trump! Hate Trump! Hate Trump!”  When you insist on hating Trump, you are doing the very thing the dark realm has been shouting to humanity for years. Please – don’t side with evil.

    May we all learn accurate discernment and choose the side of truth.

    United we stand, divided we fall.

    David Sorensen

  • Another Scientist CONFIRMS COVID-19 was man-made – HE WORKED THERE

    Another Scientist CONFIRMS COVID-19 was man-made – HE WORKED THERE

    Yet another scientist claims COVID-19 is a man-made virus that leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

    This time it’s a former scientist and vice president of EcoHealth Alliance, Dr. Andrew Huff, who called the lab leak “one of the greatest cover-ups in history – and the biggest US intelligence failure since 9/11”.

    Of course, he wrote a book, “The Truth About Wuhan,” where he calls the pandemic a direct result of the US government’s funding of coronavirus research in China. I suspect he’s referring to the gain of function research that Dr. Fauci denies.

    “EcoHealth Alliance and foreign laboratories did not have the adequate control measures in place for ensuring proper biosafety, biosecurity, and risk management, ultimately resulting in the lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” he said in his book, an exclusive pre-release copy of which was provided to Publication.

    Dr. Huff claims EcoHealth Alliance has been studying coronaviruses in bats for more than a decade with funding from the National Institutes of Health. They helped the Wuhan lab put together the “best existing methods to engineer bat coronaviruses to attack other species”.

    Dr. Huff also writes in his book:

    “China knew from day one that this was a genetically engineered agent,”

    “The US government is to blame for the transfer of dangerous biotechnology to the Chinese. – I was terrified by what I saw, we were just handing them bioweapon technology.”

    EcoHealth Alliance has been controversial since 2020 when Peter Dazak, President of EcoHealth, published an open letter condemning conspiracy theories suggesting COVID-19 does not have a natural origin. The letter titled: Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19 was signed by Dazak and 27 other scientists. It was later determined (by FOIA requests) the letter was created to conceal his role and create the impression of scientific unanimity.

    Alex Berenson @AlexBerenson
    1/ The #FauciEmails are the gift that keeps on giving. Remember Peter Daszak? He’s at the heart of all of it – his group funneled NIH money to the Wuhan lab, and he organized a letter to @TheLancet in February 2020 condemning “conspiracy theories” about #SARSCoV2…
    Image
    Image

    5:04 PM ∙ Jun 3, 2021

    2,462Likes986Retweets

    Peter Dazak was also one of the scientists sent by the WHO to Wuhan, China to investigate the origins of the pandemic.

    EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Dazak failed to comply with congressional requests into investigations of the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Miranda Devine @mirandadevine
    That would be Dr Fauci’s mate Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance that funneled NIH money to the Wuhan lab to circumvent US restrictions on risky – and, as it turned out, lethal – gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses https://t.co/rGVRkgXGk6

    Dr. Andrew G. Huff @AGHuff

    At EcoHealth we used to throw parties at the Cosmo Club and get everyone in DC that attended all boozed up before we gave them presentations on all the great things that we were doing. That is one way to get really big checks of tax payer money in DC. https://t.co/zzIEIwjpYY

    2:42 PM ∙ Dec 2, 2022

    359Likes133Retweets

    The US Senate spent more than 15 months investigating the origins of COVID-19 and determined that there is substantial evidence that COVID ‘most likely’ leaked from a lab. You can read my article on that here:

    Dr. Panda’s Newsletter
    Substantial Evidence that COVID ‘most likely’ leaked from lab
    Finally, they are starting to admit it. We’re getting closer to the truth – closer than we’re used to getting from the authorities. The COVID-19 pandemic was the result of a lab leak in China…
    Read more
    a month ago · 23 likes · 4 comments · Dr Panda

    If you think EcoHealth couldn’t possibly be still working on virus research…. you’d be wrong. Dr. Fauci’s NIH restored funding after suspending it for nearly 2 years. EcoHealth has been studying different coronaviruses for 10 years all with funding from NIH. Currently there are 3 funded projects for 2022.

    Why is EcoHealth still being funded?

    As everyone talks about the ‘next pandemic’ they really mean the next biosecurity leak.

    Thanks for reading everyone!

  • Men shall become gods

    Men shall become gods

    Why would men want to become gods?

    How about:

    • power?
    • wealth?
    • control?
    • world domination?

    Well, to take control, they would have to get everyone else to give up the God-given rights.

    How would this happen?

    Man would have to give up his higher level of thinking to not be able to reason against the attack. There is one way to divert man from higher level reasoning.

    FEAR!

    Fear results in putting man into survival mode, agenda driven, focusing on the immediate and excluding reasoning on the big picture of what is going on around him.

    How can a group of self-made gods make that happen.

    Fear not, for I am with you; Be not dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you, Yes, I will help you, I will uphold you  – Isaiah 41:10

    Plagues:

    As a model we can look at the book of Exodus, where God struck fear into the heart of the Egyptians, and we can look at how he did that – he used plagues.

    Where have we seen plagues generated recently?

    In late 2019 a plague was released by man, and the accompanying narrative was separation from others, for man to accept total control by those in power, losing all freedom in the process.

    Was this an accidental release of a plague?

    Was a plague developed by man and why?

    If it was developed by man, was the release accidental?

    Preceding this release, was there any related action by man that would show the release was premeditated?

    Was there a blueprint drawn up by those who would control us?

    Was there a solution to the problem before the problem, the plague, appeared?

    Were there solutions patented before the problem appeared?

    Were the people involved in the blueprint, in the patents, in the planning, in the declarations, positioned to benefit from the release of the plague?

    Or was the plague just a cover event to execute a more sinister plan of control?

    “Vaccine”

    I have heard the question asked: Was the “vaccine” for the plague, or was the plague released as an excuse for the “vaccine”.

    What is a vaccine? Traditionally it takes a weakened form of a disease which is then injected into a human so that the God-given immune system can develop antibodies against this specific disease.

    Do this “vaccine” meet this requirement?

    Why would the government health agencies redefine a vaccine to allow this technology to be classified as a vaccine?

    If the “vaccine” doesn’t match the traditional defining of the term, could it be to serve another purpose?

    In case you are wondering why I say “vaccines”, they are not really as defined as vaccines and may be actually gene therapy, potentially altering your God-given DNA.

    The People

    Look at the names on the patents and the names of the people and companies what are benefiting from the selling of this “vaccine”.

    Look at the names of the people who have been involved in the plan.

    The process.

    Look at the lack of testing before the release.

    Look at the lack of documentation which would allow for informed consent of those to whom the “vaccine” is administered.

    Are there current approved drugs available which can successful treat those affected by the plague?

    Is there a reason to promote an experimental “vaccine” when these approved drugs are available?

    Why are these drugs now vilified by the same people who are requesting emergency authorization for this “vaccine”

    Why are all deaths during the plague codified as due to the plague?

    The “vaccine” and the plague:

    Why are the negative side effects of the “vaccine” downplayed?

    If the “vaccine” is mandatory for stopping the spread of the plague, why was it not tested for transmission from person to person?

    Why is the promotion of the emergency use “vaccine” still promoted when the majority of the people dying of the plague are the “vaccinated”?

    Why are young adults who are of less risk to death from the plague mandated to accept the “vaccine”

    Why are children who are of even less risk being mandated for the “vaccine” in spited of the side-effect risks?

    Why are infants, who are at extremely low risks of death from the plague, mandated in spite of the greater risk of side-effects?

    Who benefits from all these mandates?

    Could the primary benefit of these vaccine mandates be the financial benefit to the drug companies? And the patent holders?

    Why do the US government health agencies hold any of these patents and why do they financially benefit from these “vaccines”?

    Do the people who are mandating these “vaccines” financially benefit (payoffs from the drug companies, commissions etc.) from these mandates?

    Are the hospitals really being compensated for every plague victim who has been treated by the protocol of those mandating the “vaccines”, a protocol of isolation, intubation, the administering of a kidney destroying approved drug, really being paid by government in excess of $250,000 for each victim coded as the plague?

    Could this be why these hospitals deny access for the patients for the administration of these now “banned” drugs in favor of a protocol with such a high death rate?

    Died Suddenly

    What is in the “vaccines”?

    Why no listing of ingredients as in other medications?

    If you are awake, or even if you are blissfully unaware, I recommend this documentary movie on why so many are now dying suddenly.

    #diedsuddenly

    Looking back:

    A century ago, wasn’t there medical training for natural health means, including nutrition and non-invasive medical solutions?

    Did a group of “philanthropists” assume control of the system to train doctors?

    Does this group rely on one form of treatment, and vilify alternative methods of natural health, nutrition, chiropractic etc.?

    Does this group own a significant part of the pharmaceutical industry?

    Does the AMA (American Medical Association) have control over how doctors must operate.

    Do doctors now have to comply with AMA doctrine which seems to go from symptom to RX to side-effect to another RX etc or lose their ability to practice?

    Have medical doctors who were successfully treating and saving lives of patients using approved drugs been decertified from their profession when these drugs became vilified at the time the emergency use of experimental “vaccines” was requested?

    Has the media and big tech been complicit in this attack on doctors who don’t “toe the line” on the official narrative?

    Rebellion against God:

    I will ascend above the heights of the clouds,
    I will be like the Most High.’  Isaiah 14:14

    Lucifer was the first to rebel against the authority of God, and end up being cast down to Earth, along with the third of the angels who followed him

    So rebellion against God is older than mankind, but is still alive today.

    Have you listened to the words of Yuval Noah Harari, whom Barack Obama, Bill Gates, and Mark Zuckerberg consider as the foremost prophet today? He said something like God can only create organic beings, man can create inorganic beings which will allow us to create eternal life, without the need for Jesus and for Heaven. Check it out for yourself on Google.

    Can it be that Lucifer/Satan is still at work against God and man today?

    Jesus said in John 10:10

    The thief does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly.

    And just what does Satan want to do? How about to steal your identity as a child of God, to kill and destroy your relationship with God and replace it with your path to eternal damnation with him.

    Is it true that those seem to control the world today worship Satan?

    Could this list include the Illuminati, the Khazarian Mafia, The Club of Rome, of London, of DC, the WEF and the groups the they control, the Rothchilds, the Rockefellers, the Orsinis etc.?

    And if they are a part of Satan’s plan, could it be that man is their enemy too?

    Could it be there is a plan to destroy the world while they are safely ensconced in their luxurious underground areas?

    Could it be they want to enslave man to be their servants?

    Child and Sex Trafficking:

    Lest we forget, most of what is coming is on the theme of “Save the Children”

    The pedophiles (and worse) in government, Hollywood, and media are about to be exposed.

    Was Ghislane Maxwell given 20 years on prison for supplying children to “no-one”?

    As Jesus said in Luke 17:2

    It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were thrown into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.

    Depopulation:

    Just a few notes here, as I detest this subject of death and destruction.

    Why did Bill Gates declare the world is overpopulated and that vaccines could reduce the world population by 10%? And what is in these vaccines that he promotes that will accomplish this end? Could it be that he is proposing killing off 10% of the world with these vaccines?

    Kissinger’s quote from a speech to the WHO Council of Eugenics, February 25, 2009:

    “Once the herd accepts mandatory vaccinations, it’s game over. They will accept anything-forcible blood or organ donation- “for the greater good.” We can genetically modify children and sterilize them— “for the greater good.” Control sheep minds and you control the herd. Vaccine makers stand to make billions. And many of you in this room are investors. It’s a big win-win. We thin out the herd and the herd pay us for the extermination services…”

    On this subject, Kissinger is credited for the creation of the World Economic Forum (WEF).

    Let My People Go!

    As you can read in Exodus, there arose a Pharoah who did not know Joseph who felt threatened by the Hebrews and enslaved them to build projects for him. After 400 years in Egypt, the LORD responded to the cries of the Hebrews and arranged their freedom.

    Do you not see this happening today?

    Do you not know God’s people are praying, crying out to the LORD, to free them from slavery? His people have been forbidden to worship him publicly, including shutting down gathering together to worship.

    Do you not see biblical Egypt today with the elite trying to enslave mankind. Have you not heard Klaus Schwab of WEF declare that he controls many of the governments of the world through his trainees (Trudeau, Macron, Zelinski, Ardern) and his protégée Joe Biden. Where do you think Build Back Better originated? And Build Back Better requires that you destroy first what has been built!

    In Exodus, the LORD sent a series of plagues against Egypt. Satan always tries to imitate God so he is doing the same today, We have seen plagues released, the most recent in 2019. And I believe there are more plagues in the wings to be released, required if they are to require the world to submit to their power, such as through “vaccines” and lockdowns, especially to curtail any worship of Almighty God.

    Isn’t it interesting that bars and clubs stayed open when churches were shut down. We can’t have His people gathering together and comparing notes, can we now? Isn’t it interesting the Big Business stayed open and small business was shut down? But I digress.

    The plagues put the fear of the LORD on the hearts of the Egyptians to the point where they cried out to Pharoah to let the Hebrews go. Isn’t it interesting that Satan has copied this message today, putting fear in our hearts to succumb to “Pharoah” today.

    Do you remember that these plagues on Egypt did not affect the Hebrews who lived separately in Bashan?

    I believe we will see this protection today, as the LORD’s people will be protected. Did you watch the Ten Commandments movie with Charlton Heston where the Hebrews locked themselves in with the blood of the lamb on the door so the death angel would pass over them?

    Will we see similar protection as God’s people are locked in for a day or two while His Angels enact justice on Satan’s folks?

    If I am right here, you will want to be in good standing with the LORD, the Creator of the universe, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, to be considered His when judgement over evil is taken! I recommend that you start today as it appears that this movement is imminent.

    Red Sea Moment:

    I believe our red sea moment will be at least of a magnitude with what we saw in the movie.

    Do you remember when the LORD placed a thick cloud between the Egyptian army and the Hebrews, leading the Hebrews across the dry red sea, and then cascaded the waters back down on the pursuing Egyptians, destroying them?

    Do you not see Him doing this again today.

    All through the bible, we read of the LORD sending His prophets to warn the people of the judgment to come if they don’t repent.

    Today, we are hearing the voices of His prophets, not only telling us of the judgment to come, but to give us hope that the LORD and his Heavenly Host are already moving today. Have you not seen the evidence?

    As with Moses, Gideon, Joshua, David, and many more, we see God’s will in play though man. As we don’t look to man for salvation, we do look to see whom He has annointed for His purpose today.

     

    In conclusion,

    as we see these totalitarian world events taking place around us, I again encourage you to draw tight to the LORD and He will draw tight to you.

    May God bless you and may God bless America.

    Ron, the Watchman on the Wall

    choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve ……………….  But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord

  • What’s Causing All These Excess Deaths?

    What’s Causing All These Excess Deaths?

    What’s Causing All These Excess Deaths?

    Data analysis shows 11X increase in sudden deaths in Canada

    DR PANDA
    NOV 27

    SAVE

    ▷  LISTEN

    Very interesting post today about sudden deaths in Canada.

    Recently anonymous authors searched necrocanda.com’s obituary database. They searched certain terms from 2018 through November 2022 looking for sudden deaths. What they found was an 11X increase in sudden death cases in Canada. What was an average of 80 obituaries pre-pandemic mentioning sudden death skyrocketed to 899 in 2022. The year isn’t even over yet. Interestingly, they also determined the increases in sudden death obituaries coincide with the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.

    About the study

    Motivated by all of the sudden death reports in the media, anonymous authors performed a keyword search to catch “clear-cut” cases of sudden death on necrocanada.com. Necro Canada is a search engine specializing in providing information on death notices published in Canada.

    Some basic statistics note a 4X jump in 2021 and an 11x jump in 2022 in sudden death cases.

    Then they broke down the sudden death reports by month. Shockingly the deaths explode in October and November of this year. Which is around the time Heath Canada is pushing the booster for winter.

    Per province deaths were highest in Ontario and Quebec. Both are highly vaccinated provinces.

    Back in April, Kelly Brown, a COVID Data analyst, found a 25% weekly excess death rate for 3 months that “can’t be explained by a sudden rush of suicides, overdoses, cancers, etc.”

    Kelly Brown @rubiconcapital_
    🇨🇦 Ages 0 to 44 – Excess Mortality 🚨 This cohort including millennials, saw persistent >25% weekly excess deaths to Oct. 2021, after a rapid acceleration in July 2021. The rate of change starting in July can’t be explained by a sudden rush of suicides, overdoses, cancers, etc.
    Image

    11:08 PM ∙ Apr 9, 2022

    1,454Likes791Retweets

    He notes that Alberta and British Columbia have the most robust data. His analysis shows the actual number of excess deaths exceeds the predicted baseline by nearly 70%. Calling it a “tsunami of death.”

    Kelly Brown @rubiconcapital_
    What is going on in Alberta and British Columbia? From Stats🇨🇦 data, excess deaths in ages 0-44 as of Dec. ’21 are MORE THAN 70% of expected deaths, since accelerating in Jul ’21. This is the real “tsunami of death”, and a public health emergency that must be investigated ASAP.
    Image

    11:06 PM ∙ Apr 11, 2022

    2,974Likes1,616Retweets

    Shockingly still no one is talking about this. This isn’t just a Canada thing. Excess mortality is up in every heavily vaccinated country even when adjusting for COVID deaths. There seems to be a real emergency going on here and it’s not COVID.

    Kelly Brown @rubiconcapital_
    In my view, this is a potential public health emergency that needs to be investigated immediately. From July to October 2021 (good data to Oct.), weekly excess deaths among young people (over baseline) averaged ~65/week. Journalists/media, please turn your attention to this.

    11:08 PM ∙ Apr 9, 2022

    396Likes118Retweets

    Check out their GitHub and learn more about their analysis. If you are tech-savvy, download their code and run your own data analysis.

  • Science for Hire Report

    Science for Hire Report

    STORY AT-A-GLANCE (from Dr Mercola)

    • “Science for Hire,” produced by Gary Null, is a film that tackles some of the most critical scientific issues threatening the health and well-being of the U.S. public
    • Long-standing systemic corruption in medical organizations and medical schools, federal regulatory agencies and academic journals has led to a world where pseudoscience and misinformation rules
    • Elected officials and the media are captured by the highest bidder, and those who dare speak out against the establishment are attacked, their careers often destroyed in the process
    • The film covers a wide range of topics — from corruption at Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — an arm of the National Institutes of Health — to the opioid epidemic
    • Set aside two hours to watch the film in its entirety for an eye-opening look at the dark side of the scientific, pharmaceutical and military industrial complexes

    In 2003, Gary Null, Ph.D., was a coauthor of the bombshell “Death by Medicine” article1 which described how the conventional American medical system had become the No. 1 leading cause of death and injury in the U.S., claiming the lives of nearly 783,936 people annually. Now, Null is the executive producer of “Science for Hire,” a film that tackles some of the most critical scientific issues threatening the health and well-being of the U.S. public.2

    Due to long-standing systemic corruption in medical organizations and medical schools, federal regulatory agencies, and academic journals, “we enter a world where pseudoscience and misinformation rules.”3 Elected officials and the media are captured by the highest bidder, and those who dare speak out against the establishment are attacked, their careers often destroyed in the process.

    There’s no separation between governments and the pharmaceutical industry which operate, the film notes, “in lockstep … to erect an unregulated global regime, a ‘Great Reset,’ that will dictate what we can eat, what medical interventions are permitted and banned, and the rewards and punishments that legislate our choices.”4

    The film covers a wide range of topics — from corruption at Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — an arm of the National Institutes of Health — to the opioid epidemic. I urge you to set aside two hours to watch the film in its entirety for an eye-opening look at the dark side of the scientific, pharmaceutical, and military industrial complexes.

    US Medical System Captured by Big Pharma From the Start

    Many of the most powerful health strategies cost nothing at all or can be implemented very inexpensively. Yet, not only are these natural strategies not taught in conventional medical schools, but if you go against the standard, pharmaceutical-based treatment options you can be challenged, reprimanded or have your medical license taken away.

    This process ostracizing natural therapies began back in 1910 with the release of the Flexner Report, which was written in commission for the Carnegie Foundation.5 The Flexner Report essentially eliminated almost every form of natural medicine, because it was a competitor to the emerging class of pharmaceuticals, primarily derived from oil and petroleum products that John Rockefeller was behind.6

    So Big Pharma’s infiltration of regulatory and public health agencies goes back more than 100 years to the creation of the Rockefeller Foundation in 1913. Just two years earlier, Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company had been ruled an unreasonable monopoly and split into 34 companies, which became Exxon, Mobil, Chevron, Amoco, Marathon and others.7

    The breakup only served to increase Rockefeller’s wealth, however, and the foundation he created under his named was deemed “a menace to the future political and economic welfare of the nation.”

    The Foundation, in partnership with Andrew Carnegie and educator Abraham Flexner, then set out to centralize U.S. medical schooling, orienting it to the “germ theory” of disease, which states that germs are solely responsible for disease and necessitates the use of pharmaceuticals to target said germs.

    With that narrative in hand, Rockefeller financed the campaign to consolidate mainstream medicine, adopt the philosophies of the growing pharmaceutical industry and shutter its competition. Many don’t realize that today the Rockefellers own half of the pharmaceutical industry.

    Rockefeller’s crusade caused the closure of more than half of U.S. medical schools, fostered public and press scorn for homeopathy, osteopathy, chiropractic, nutritional, holistic, functional, integrative and natural medicines, and led to the incarceration of many practicing physicians.8 The complete story can be found in Robert F. Kennedy’s book, “The Real Anthony Fauci.” As “Science for Hire” noted:9

    “About 100 years ago, things were really beginning to change in the United States. We were changing from an agrarian economy to an industrial economy. Titans of industry really wanted to be able to control the world financial system as a whole. When the Rockefellers took over the allopathic medicine, there were many types of medical education in the United States.

    There were homeopathic doctors and there were naturopathic doctors who were using natural medicines to heal, and they were having very good outcomes. Once the Rockefellers took over the system, they closed down those other schools and they only promoted the sale of their drugs. They promoted surgery and they promoted radiation.

    The Rockefellers were also in charge of the oil industry and the chemical industry. And they also made an alliance with a huge German concern called IG Farben, which was a big chemical industry in Germany and the largest financier of the Nazi rise to power.”

    ‘In the 1930s, the FDA Became a Monster’

    Around the time the Rockefeller Foundation was building momentum, there were serious concerns with the meatpacking industry and the food industry in general. Unsanitary conditions at meatpacking plants were the norm, while poisonous preservatives and dyes were widely used in foods. Medications also made false “cure-all” claims and often included toxic ingredients.10

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration was started in the 1930s to address many of these pitfalls and “was sold to the people of the United States as an agency that was going to protect its food and drug supply,” the film noted.

    “There was a lot of mischief going on in the food industry and the FDA was set up to correct that problem,” William Faloon, director of Life Extension Foundation, added. “They evolved into regulating drugs, medical devices and, at this point, they regulate just about anything that goes into the human body.”11

    But by 1938, said Jonathan Emord, constitutional lawyer, and author of “Restore the Republic,” “the FDA became a monster. And from that point forward, it has grown by leaps and bounds until the ‘60s when it acquired jurisdiction over both safety and efficacy of drugs.” In 1938, under Franklin Roosevelt, the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act was passed, which gave the FDA authority to regulate medical devices and cosmetics and establish standards for foods.12

    Basically, the FDA appointed itself as the expert. In 1962, an amendment was passed that expanded the FDA’s authority to not only regulate drug safety but also the effectiveness of new drugs. Emord continued, “At that point, the FDA was largely a captive of industry. The FDA does no clinical testing of drugs itself. It relies entirely on submissions made to it by the drug companies. This would appear to the average person to be a gross conflict of interest. And in fact, it is.”13

    Leemon McHenry, Professor Emeritus, philosophy and bioethics, with California State University, Northridge, explained:14

    “We need independent testing to take the clinical trials out of the hands of the pharmaceutical industry. This needs to be the responsibility of government and universities rather than the pharmaceutical industry testing their own products. It’s the proverbial fox guarding the henhouse. What we have is a corruption of the system. And it’s particularly alarming that the regulatory agencies of the government don’t do anything about it.”

    AMA, WHO, NIH, CDC Controlled by Big Pharma

    The American Medical Association only contributes to the corruption of the health care industry, as they sell lists to the drug industry revealing which drugs certain doctors are prescribing. Big Pharma can then reward doctors prescribing the most expensive medications. McHenry continued:15

    “The oligarchy of corporations here has basically usurped cherished institutions of democracy, which involve checks and balances in the system but also scientific integrity. So who’s looking out for scientific integrity?”

    Dr. Paul Marik, a critical care doctor formerly with Sentara Norfolk General Hospital in East Virginia, who is renowned for his work in creating the “Marik cocktail,” which significantly reduces death rates from sepsis using inexpensive, safe, generic medications,16 was interviewed in the film. He went so far as to call for Big Pharma to be removed from the equation entirely to protect public health worldwide:17

    “WHO should be there to represent the interests of people on this planet. That’s what their job is. But unfortunately, the WHO, the NIH, CDC are so influenced by Big Pharma. So, I think, you know, we need to evolve to the point where Big Pharma gets removed from the equation. Big Pharma is the biggest contributor to lobbyists. They control the media; they control the press.

    So, they have a stranglehold on free speech, scientific investigation, scientific integrity. I think COVID has brought up the worst in this respect. And I think it’s time that these organizations should go back to what the goal is, what the fundamental job is, to provide the best health to people on this planet. And that profiteering should not be driving this.”

    The result is that scientific freedom and academic freedom are myths. “The NIH gets into contractual relationships with companies that, once they patent a drug, the NIH gets a certain amount of the revenue. They make a lot of money from these patented drugs and their development, including the vaccines,” Marik said.18

    According to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the FDA gets 45% of its annual budget from the pharmaceutical industry, while WHO gets about half of its budget from private sources such as Big Pharma and its foundations. Further, the CDC owns 56 vaccine patents, and buys and distributes $4.6 billion in vaccines every year, amounting to more than 40% of its total budget.19 With this level of corporate capture, how can they have the public’s best interests at heart?

    Opioid Epidemic Reveals Drug Industry’s True Motives

    Over the last two to three decades, especially in the case of blockbuster drugs, McHenry explained, many medications have been sold where “the risk-benefit ratio is not in favor of taking the drug.”20 In many cases, people who shouldn’t have been taking drugs or vaccines in the first place ended up having serious adverse events after taking drugs or getting shots, like the HPV vaccine, they didn’t really need.

    The opioid epidemic is a perfect example. Worldwide, 40.5 million people struggle with opioid dependence, a global prevalence of 510 cases per 100,000 people.21 Opioids have a very high rate of addiction, as they trigger your brain to release endorphins that not only relieve pain but also create feelings of pleasure and well-being.

    As the good feelings wear off, the craving to recreate them by taking more pills can be strong, but soon tolerance develops and an even higher dose is needed to get the same feel-good boost.

    Using opioids for as few as five days increases the risk of long-term use,22 and many people who start out taking the drugs for back pain or other chronic pain end up addicted. An estimated 21% to 29% of people prescribed opioids for chronic pain misuse them and 8% to 12% develop an opioid use disorder. Many also transition to using heroin; an estimated 80% of heroin users misused prescription opioids first.23

    Unfortunately, opioids continue to be prescribed in cases where less addictive medications could be used instead. And patients are often kept in the dark about the drugs’ true addictive nature, believing they’re safe since they’re prescribed by a doctor. From October 2019 to October 2020, there were 91,862 estimated overdose deaths in the U.S., which represents a 30% increase in 12 months.24

    Opioids, including oxycodone, hydrocodone and morphine, accounted for most deaths — 68,399 — followed by synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl and tramadol.25 Purdue Pharma, manufacturer of OxyContin, and its owners the Sackler family, will pay up to $12 billion as part of a settlement with 23 states for their responsibility in starting — and sustaining — the opioid epidemic.26,27

    This is just one example. Other blockbuster drugs, like Vioxx and statins, have also been implicated in adverse reactions, including deaths, and their makers convicted of fraudulent marketing.28

    COVID-19 Pandemic: The Culmination of Censorship and Control

    The second half of the film details the widespread censorship and corruption that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. While effective treatments were downplayed and those who attempted to use them ostracized from their professions, COVID-19 shots were foisted upon the population, including children — a population at little risk from the virus and high risk of harm from the shots.

    Research showed concerning effects of COVID-19 shots, including myocarditis, decreases in fertility, risk of miscarriage and changes to women’s menstrual cycles. As pathologist Dr. Roger Hodkinson stated, “If there are fertility issues as a consequence of this, it could be the most grotesque mistake ever made in medical history.”29 Dr. Richard Fleming, a physicist, nuclear cardiologist and attorney, also explained:30

    “The research done by independent researchers have shown that there is damage to the brains and other body organs caused by these viruses and these vaccines that are called prion diseases. So, you can have mad cow disease in the brain or Alzheimer’s in the brain or amyloid disease in the heart, which is another type of prion disease.

    But the studies done by people doing the research on the animals have been very clear and very consistent. Prion diseases, inflammation and blood clotting … and real concerns about miscarriages and other health problems and deaths. None of this has been done by Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen or the other companies.”

    Cancer is also a possibility, with doctors stating that their patients have come out of remission after years shortly after receiving the shots. “We have so many fundamental questions in biology right now that need to be answered. And this isn’t in a petri dish. These products are in 5 billion human beings now,” noted Jessica Rose, a data analyst and postdoctoral researcher.31

    Paving the Way for Global Control

    At this point, even though WHO is not qualified to make global health decisions, it is attempting to seize control over global pandemic monitoring and response via the development of a new pandemic treaty. As reported by Ben Swann of Truth in Media:32

    “The WHO is on track to get nearly all Western countries to sign on to this agreement on pandemic preparedness that would grant the WHO absolute power over global biosecurity such as the power to implement digital identities, vaccine passports, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions globally, standardized medical care and so much more.

    This treaty includes 190 countries and would be legally binding. If a pandemic is declared, the WHO takes over the global health management of the pandemic. What’s more here, the WHO would be in full control over what gets called a pandemic. They can dictate how doctors can respond, which drugs can and cannot be used or which vaccines are approved. And this is for the entire globe, not just one country.”

    Bill Gates is also building a pandemic response team for the WHO, dubbed the “Global Epidemic Response & Mobilization,” or GERM, Team. This team will be made up of thousands of disease experts under WHO’s purview and will monitor nations and make decisions about when to suspend civil liberties to prevent spread of an illness.33

    Swann continued, “Bill Gates has announced the creation of a pandemic German team that will monitor sovereign nations and decide when they need to suspend civil liberties, force people to wear masks and to close borders. According to Gates, the global team will be made up of some 3,000 disease experts under WHO purview and will receive around $1 billion per year in funding.”34

    All these efforts — the orchestration of health agencies captured by industry, gain-of-function research, media manipulation, the downfall of scientific credibility, propaganda and the creation of “pandemic preparedness” treaties — are intended to culminate in one thing — the enabling of global power. “It is a new vehicle for exerting global economic and political power,” the film notes. “This is the reality that’s behind all this and we need to wake up.”35

    OK, how long will We the People allow these criminals to perpetrate crimes against humanity?

    Looks like time for Nuremburg 2.0?

    As for me, I am waiting as the LORD continues to expose massive evil.

    We may have just gone through an election of Republican against Democrat, but this battle is not against flesh and blood but against principalities and powers, Good vs. Evil!

    Ron, the Watchman on the Wall