We elected Trump as our President, to fulfil his campaign promises.
I don’t know about you, but I didn’t vote for these judges. Wait, nobody voted for them… How then can they usurp the legitimate power of a duly elected President, where international affairs and defense of the nation are his prerogative?
I agree with the article below. How about you
Ron
Supreme Court Defies Activist Judges by Handing Trump Major Wins
If you’ve been feeling like unelected judges are running the country, you’re not alone—and you’re not wrong. From coast to coast, radical activist judges have taken it upon themselves to halt, rewrite, and obstruct just about everything President Trump tries to do. These robe-clad resistors are less interested in applying the law than they are in blocking America First policies. Apparently, separation of powers is just a suggestion.
Time and again, these judges slap down lawful executive actions with questionable decisions, often rubber-stamped by left-leaning interest groups. They’re not just challenging Trump—they’re subverting the very foundations of constitutional governance. They may think they’re heroes of the resistance, but rest assured, their day of reckoning is coming. For now, their behavior speaks volumes about how little liberal elites care about the American people.
But here’s the good news: Despite their best efforts to sabotage the will of the citizens, President Trump is racking up victory after victory—thanks to a Supreme Court that still remembers how to read the Constitution.
From ‘Just The News’:
“District courts have issued more universal injunctions and TROs during February 2025 alone than through the first three years of the Biden Administration… That sharp rise in universal injunctions stops the Executive Branch from performing its constitutional functions before any courts fully examine the merits of those actions…”
Robed resistance: when judges join the opposition
Lower-court judges have thrown legal spaghetti at the wall, hoping something sticks. Whether it’s pausing deportations, reinstating thousands of underperforming federal workers, or trying to force the return of an alleged MS-13 gang member, activist judges appear increasingly willing to rewrite executive policy from the bench.
Take the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia—a Salvadoran national flagged for suspected gang ties who was deported under Trump’s reinstated enforcement priorities. A Maryland judge ordered the administration to both “facilitate and effectuate” his return to the United States, despite unclear legal authority and the fact that El Salvador refused to release him. The Supreme Court intervened, staying the lower court’s order and noting that the judge’s language “may exceed the District Court’s authority.”
The Constitution still has a spine—and it’s wearing a robe too
What progressives paint as “authoritarian overreach” is, in reality, the executive branch doing its job. Lucky for Americans, our system still works—when judges remember their role isn’t to legislate from the bench.
Since returning to office, President Trump has made heavy use of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to tear through layers of waste and redundancy. When a California judge froze the administration’s effort to remove thousands of federal employees, SCOTUS stepped in, allowing DOGE to proceed with putting 16,000 underperforming workers on administrative leave.
Then there’s the ruling from Chief Justice John Roberts that permitted Trump to temporarily fire Biden-appointed members of two key federal boards: the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board. A lower court had tried to block those removals, arguing Trump lacked authority. Roberts’ stay restored basic executive power—something that shouldn’t need reminding.
Even in the rare instances where the Supreme Court did not back Trump—like in the 5-4 ruling forcing the release of frozen USAID funds—conservative justices issued scathing dissents. Justice Samuel Alito captured the mood, writing: “The answer to that question should be an emphatic ‘No,’ but a majority of this Court apparently thinks otherwise. I am stunned.”
Stunned is putting it lightly.
Draining the bureaucratic swamp… one ruling at a time
Aside from court victories, the Trump administration is scoring big wins behind the scenes—squeezing waste out of bloated agencies and shining a light on dysfunctional spending.
Thanks to DOGE’s aggressive audits and reforms, Trump’s team has already saved taxpayers over $150 billion. That’s despite repeated legal attempts to block access to Treasury Department data—attempts that have largely failed or been reversed.
One federal judge initially barred DOGE employee Ryan Wunderly from accessing key financial systems used to chase down fraud. After pushback and procedural corrections, the judge backtracked—allowing Wunderly limited access after undergoing standard training. Elon Musk didn’t hold back, blasting the original ruling as “absolutely insane” and warning that “something super shady is going to protect scammers.”
Looks like the Swamp was hoping to keep its secrets. Too bad for them, the people elected a president willing to rip the curtain down.
Key Takeaways:
- The Supreme Court has consistently overturned activist lower court rulings aimed at undermining Trump’s agenda.
- Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act and immigration enforcement has been restored by SCOTUS over liberal opposition.
- Bureaucracy-shrinking efforts have already saved $150 billion, reinforcing Trump’s commitment to small, efficient government.
- Judicial reform legislation like the “No Rogue Rulings Act” shows Congress is fighting to protect constitutional balance.
Source: Just The News
